Peer Review: it still matters

By now, the whole sad Rogoff & Reinhart story is well-known and well-hashed. But there’s one important point that I don’t see many people making.

There are three RR papers on debt and growth. Their NBER working paper, their American Economic Review Papers & Proceedings paper of the same name, and their Journal of Economic Perspectives paper that adds Vince Reinhart as a third author.

What do all these have in common that has been neglected?

NONE OF THEM ARE PEER-REVIEWED!

I am not making this up.

While the American Economic Review is the flagship journal of our profession, the annual papers and proceedings issue, is made up of very short pieces that do not undergo peer review. Rogoff has this piece listed on his webpage simply as AER, which is very un-needed bit of resume padding.

Similarly, the Journal of Economic Perspectives, is a publication designed to provide popular presentations of research questions. On its webpage it states, “Articles appearing in the journal are normally solicited by the editors and associate editors.”

And, NBER working papers are not peer reviewed at all.

Everyone inside the economics profession knows this. Either R&R did not seek to publish their results in a peer reviewed journal, or no peer reviewed journal would accept them.

The latter case would not surprise me in the least as the papers utter fail to deal with the causality issue and the statistical methods employed are fairly primitive.

Peer review, people. It still matters.

5 thoughts on “Peer Review: it still matters

  1. Pingback: Peer Review: it still matters. How Rogoff and Reinhart got their message out. « Economics Info

  2. I think your writing could be a little more precise.

    When I read “Everyone inside the economics profession knows this.” it sounds like you’re saying that everyone inside our profession knew that Rogoff and Reinhart was not peer-reviewed.

    But I think you mean that every economist knows those 3 outlets are not peer-reviewed.

    I certainly did not recognize the first, although I do know the second. But I never bothered to check if the Rogoff and Reinhart mini-literature was ever peer-reviewed.

    Thanks for noticing Kevin!

    • Hi Dave: Thanks for finding us over here! Yes, I meant everyone knows that Papers & Proceedings and JEP are not peer reviewed. I myself was surprised when I checked and found that the RR debt-growth result never came out in any peer reviewed outlet.

  3. I don’t think one should really be highly concerned about these things; it does not really matter too much if we work wisely. I have learned to ignore a lot of things ever since I have become Forex trader, I believe that the lesser complicated the matter will be the greater chance of success we are going to have and luckily with a broker of OctaFX class, it’s all great with their 50% bonus on deposit that keeps on making my task easier.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s